Site search
sponsored by
Lake Tahoe News,Real Estate,Entertainment| Tahoe Daily Tribune
 
Lake Tahoe News,Real Estate,Entertainment| Tahoe Daily Tribune
Send us your news
<< back
Thursday, March 15, 2007

Lawmakers mulling puppy prevention



Emma Garrard / Sierra Sun /  Carson, Kit, Bodie and Kona run after a ball thrown by Dennis Dugger at Truckee-Tahoe Kennels Tuesday. A new bill is being proposed to require all dogs except registered pure-breds to be spayed an neutered.
Emma Garrard / Sierra Sun /  Carson, Kit, Bodie and Kona run after a ball thrown by Dennis Dugger at Truckee-Tahoe Kennels Tuesday. A new bill is being proposed to require all dogs except registered pure-breds to be spayed an neutered.ENLARGE
Emma Garrard / Sierra Sun / Carson, Kit, Bodie and Kona run after a ball thrown by Dennis Dugger at Truckee-Tahoe Kennels Tuesday. A new bill is being proposed to require all dogs except registered pure-breds to be spayed an neutered.
Last year, more than a half-million unwanted pets were euthanized in California, according the California Department of Health Services, but a proposed Healthy Pets Act aims to reduce those deaths.

Sponsored by Assemblyman Lloyd Levine, D-Van Nuys, Assembly Bill 1634 seeks to curb the overpopulation of pets by requiring that most be spayed or neutered.

"This bill benefits taxpayers because last year it cost state and local governments $250 million to care for, house and euthanize all those animals," Levine said. "And it benefits the animals because shelter workers do the best they can, but it's not a loving home. It's terrible for the animals (that don't get adopted)."

The assembly bill, introduced late last month and still in an early draft, would require every dog and cat to be fixed by the age of four months, unless the animal is a pedigreed purebred or has a special permit from the state. Animals used for professional purposes, including guide dogs and trained police canines, are exempt.

The fee for an "intact permit" that would allow owners to breed their pets, would be determined by local jurisdictions, so it is unclear what the cost would ultimately be. However, the bill's text states that the fee "shall be no more than what is reasonably necessary to fund the administration of that jurisdiction's intact permit program."

Pet owners who fail to meet the spay/neuter requirement could face fines of $500, which would go toward local low-cost spay and neuter programs, Levine said.

Local animal control agencies will be responsible for enforcing and administering the law, should it go into effect.

Santa Cruz County and Rhode Island already have similar laws on the books, and Arizona is considering a similar statute.


facebook Print
Ads by Google
Comments
Previous Guide Line
Next Guide Line
Sort comments by:
downloading content