California utility in talks over closed-nuke costs
LOS ANGELES — Talks are underway to resolve a costly question at the shuttered San Onofre nuclear power plant in California — who pays a bill that could top $3 billion, officials disclosed Friday.
Edison International — the parent company of plant operator Southern California Edison — said in a government filing that a meeting would be held next week to discuss details of a possible deal.
SCE and minority owner San Diego Gas & Electric Co. have been negotiating with consumer advocates over how to divide a long list of costs from repairs and inspections at the now-closed reactors to replacement power once the plant shut down.
At issue has been who should take the hit — company shareholders or ratepayers. Last year, Edison chief executive Ted Craver pegged costs subject to possible refunds at roughly $1.3 billion, and the company has been taking steps anticipating such costs.
Matthew Freedman, lead attorney for the Utility Reform Network, a consumer advocacy group involved in the talks, said it wants maximum refunds for customers while ensuring that shareholders bear significant responsibility for the shutdown.
“It’s been far too long that customers have been paying for mistakes made at that plant,” Freedman said.
The twin-domed plant between San Diego and Los Angeles was closed permanently by Edison last year after a long and costly fight over whether it was safe to restart. The plant hadn’t produced electricity since January 2012, after a small radiation leak led to the discovery of extensive damage to tubing that carried radioactive water.
The problems at San Onofre centered on steam generators that were installed during a $670 million overhaul in 2009 and 2010. After the plant was shut down, tests found some generator tubes were so badly eroded that they could fail and possibly release radiation, a stunning finding inside the nearly new equipment.
The California Public Utilities Commission has been overseeing a broad investigation into costs at the plant. SCE and the other parties involved in the talks asked an agency judge not to rule on key issues, pending the outcome of the negotiations.
SCE declined comment.
Morningstar analyst Travis Miller said it was critical for Edison to resolve the case, though he emphasized a deal had not been completed.
“No investor likes uncertainty, especially when it’s a large number,” Miller said.
On Thursday, the California Independent System Operator, the agency that oversees the state’s power supply system, took steps to account for the loss of the San Onofre reactors, which could power 1.4 million homes. The plan includes upgrades to equipment at several locations in Southern California.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
It is an article of faith among progressives that income inequality is getting worse in California. In fact, claims of a widening gap between rich and poor are used nationally to justify raising taxes and…