Conservancy bill means more local control, advocates say |

Conservancy bill means more local control, advocates say

David Bunker

The California Assembly’s approval Wednesday of the Sierra Conservancy bill could mean healthier rivers and forests around Tahoe within two years and the first united conservation plan for the Sierra Nevada, advocates say.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who pushed for a Sierra Conservancy during his campaign, is expected to sign the bill into law before Sept. 30. The conservancy will channel funding into more than 20 million acres of mountains that provide a large percentage of the state’s natural resources.

“It’s the first time the Sierra will have an official voice on how state money is invested in the Sierra,” said Jim Sayer, president of the Truckee-based Sierra Business Council. “Before, it was done in Sacramento.”

Sayer said the council’s research found other regions around the state such as the Pacific Coast were landing tax dollars for conservation projects because they had conservancies. The Sierra was getting about 1 percent, the business council found.

“What’s exciting is this is going to benefit the Sierra as a whole,” said Sayer, who added that Proposition 50 funds, water bond money that could be used for watershed restoration, will be the first money available to the fledgling conservancy.

“The first thing (the conservancy) will do, is reconnaissance to find out what the needs are,” said Sayer.

Sierra Watch Executive Director Tom Mooers said he is hopeful the new conservancy could aid in his group’s quest to limit development in the Martis Valley.

“Having the conservancy there to streamline the effort … should make everything a little easier,” said Mooers, who hopes the conservancy will be up and running in time to make a difference in some of the decisions on the valley.

Assemblyman Tim Leslie, R-Tahoe City, who used to represent Nevada County in the Senate, initially opposed the conservancy idea when it was proposed by Assemblyman John Laird, D-Santa Cruz. But Leslie said he got involved in the plan to make sure private property rights and Sierra counties land use control were protected.

The bill also says the conservancy has no power over water rights that do not belong to it, Medefind said. Leslie also got his wish to include county supervisors on the conservancy board.

Leslie wasn’t the only official concerned about aspects of the bill. U.S. Representative John Doolittle, in a visit to Truckee in early August, said a Sierra conservancy would just add another governmental layer to the process. Doolittle’s district encompasses much of the central and northern Sierra.

“We don’t need other entities overlayered, other than what we’ve got,” said Doolittle. “We don’t need a conservancy and it seems to me that it can only bring mischief… we have counties; we’ll funnel (funding) through the county.”

Advocates say the conservancy will bring much greater funding, more regional cooperation, and a more unified conservation strategy to the mountain range.

The bill calls for a 13-member board with six Sierra supervisors, two members appointed by the legislature and five more picked by Schwarzenegger.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User