Californians weigh property tax break for older homeowners | TahoeDailyTribune.com

Californians weigh property tax break for older homeowners

Associated Press
In this Oct. 3, 2018 image, Vicky Campbell looks around a home for sale in her former neighborhood during an open house in Chula Vista, Calif. Campbell, a 68-year-old real estate broker. was able to bring her low property taxes along when she bought in the neighborhood years ago, utilizing a tax rule. Now, Proposition 5 would sharply expand the tax benefit for homeowners at least 55 years old and the severely disabled, if it passes during the Nov. 6 elections.
AP Photo/Gregory Bull

SAN DIEGO — Ending a low-key campaign with high stakes, California voters were set to decide Tuesday whether to expand a property tax break to older homeowners who move.

Other ballot measures commanded more time on the airwaves but Proposition 5 would deliver significant benefits to people over 55 when they sell a house and buy a new one. It would also deliver a potentially big revenue hit to schools and local governments, who rely extensively on property tax revenue.

Under current law, seniors and near-seniors, the severely disabled and natural disaster victims can transfer tax assessments if their new homes are worth the same or less than the ones they sell, and they can only do it only once. Current law also limits out-of-county transfers to counties that agree to accept them, and only 10 of 58 do.

Proposition 5 would allow over-55 homeowners to transfer their assessments to any new home — no matter what it costs — anywhere in the state and as many times as they wish.

The Legislative Analyst’s Office concluded that schools and local governments would each probably lose more than $100 million in property tax revenue a year initially and that, over time, those losses would reach about $1 billion a year for each. About 85,000 homeowners over 55 who move every year without the tax break would pay much less.

Current law requires the state to provide more funding to most schools to cover property tax losses. Not so for local governments.

Supporters said passage would end a “moving penalty” on older people and encourage more to sell, helping alleviate California’s housing shortage. The Legislative Analyst’s Office estimated home sales would increase by tens of thousands a year.

The California Association of Realtors, the measure’s main proponent, funded a consultant’s report that contended Proposition 5 would have much less impact on state and local governments, resulting in annual losses of $120 million to annual gains of $200 million.

Opponents challenged the assertion that Proposition 5 would spur construction and warned about a hit to public services.

As a result of Proposition 13 passed in 1978, a home is typically taxed at 1.1 percent of the purchase price and increases no more than 2 percent a year. Prices have risen much more, sticking many homeowners with much higher taxes when they move.

Supporters raised $13.2 million as of Oct. 23, mostly from the Realtors, whose benefit from sales commissions. Opponents raised $2.8 million, largely from the Service Employees International Union and California Teachers Association.

The Realtors recently filed notice with authorities that it would try again on the November 2020 ballot if Tuesday’s measure failed. Chris Carlisle, its legislative advocate, said it was “just to signal to our opponent we are not going away. If we lose this time, we will be back in 2020.”