Fastest-growing cities are suburban; bigger cities lose population
WASHINGTON (AP) – Elk Grove wasn’t even incorporated six years ago, and now it’s the fastest-growing city in America.
Bigger, older cities are losing ground.
The Sacramento suburb grew by 11.6 percent last year, to 112,000 people, typifying the nation’s appetite for open spaces, affordable homes and suburban living. Once a rural farming community, Elk Grove has given way to sprawling development, fueled by a short commute to Sacramento and local employers such as Apple Computer.
“Ten to 15 years ago is when the housing started coming in. That was followed by the businesses,” says Janet Toppenberg, president and CEO of the Elk Grove Chamber of Commerce.
Americans have been moving west and south for decades, and last year was no different. All but three of the 50 fastest-growing cities from 2004 to 2005 were in those regions of the country, with many in California and Florida, according to Census Bureau estimates Wednesday. The estimates were for cities with populations of 100,000 or more.
Elk Grove was followed in the top five by North Las Vegas, Nev.; Port St. Lucie, Fla.; Gilbert, Ariz., and Cape Coral, Fla.
All five are suburban, and all have fewer than 200,000 residents.
“We have a pattern that is consistent across the country,” said Hans Johnson, a research fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California. “Families choose to move to areas where they can buy more housing for less money and often with better schools.”
Los Angeles kept its position as the second most populous city, behind New York, with 3.8 million residents in 2005. The metropolis added 150,345 residents between 2000 and 2005 – more than any other city.
Suburban towns in surrounding counties added large numbers of newcomers, making them some of the fastest growing in the nation. Moreno Valley, Rancho Cucamonga and Irvine were all in the top 10.
“People like the location and the opportunity to build homes here,” said Barry Foster, Moreno Valley’s economic development director. “We’ve got room. You can get a good-sized home and all the amenities that you get in Orange County or Los Angeles counties for a more affordable price.”
Americans also are moving away from many of the nation’s biggest cities, though the reasons vary with the cities.
People are following jobs out of struggling Midwestern cities. Others are leaving expensive Northeastern and Western cities in search of more affordable homes. And people are fleeing big cities everywhere in search of better schools.
New York remained the nation’s largest city, with 8.1 million people. The city has added 135,000 people since 2000, but it lost 21,500 from 2004 to 2005, more than any other city.
Detroit, with its struggling economy, has lost 65,000 people since 2000, the most of any city. Philadelphia, which has lost about 50,000 manufacturing jobs since 2000, has lost 54,000 people during the same period.
San Francisco, with the highest real estate prices in the country, has lost 37,000 people since 2000, according to the Census Bureau. Nearby Berkeley, Oakland and Vallejo were also among the nation’s fastest shrinking cities.
The bureau issues annual population estimates based on building permits, housing units and other changes since its 2000 headcount.
States sometimes dispute those estimates based on their own calculations. For example, California officials estimate that San Francisco has grown by 22,000 people since 2000, rather than shrunk. But even if the city did add people, it did so at a much slower rate than cities in the center of the state, said John Malson, a research manager for the state Department of Finance.
“The housing market out here has gone nuts, especially in the coastal areas,” Malson said.
“The Central Valley is still more affordable than the coast,” he added. “A lot of people are moving out from the Bay Area.”
Some of the towns that have shown growth in California’s farming belt are Visalia and Bakersfield, which has taken in some new residents who commute to Los Angeles.
Most of the big cities that gained population were in the South, according to the Census Bureau.
In overall numbers, Phoenix added the most people – 44,400 – from 2004 to 2005, giving it a population of nearly 1.5 million.
New Orleans, an exception in the South, already had lost population before Hurricane Katrina. The city lost about 30,000 people from 2000 to 2005, setting its population at 455,000, the Census Bureau said in an estimate made before the hurricane scattered hundreds of thousands of people.
Local officials estimate that New Orleans has rebounded to about 221,000 people since the storm.
– Associated Press Writer Juliana Barbassa in San Francisco contributed to this report.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User