Government’s Wen Ho Lee review: Energy Department misled the FBI |

Government’s Wen Ho Lee review: Energy Department misled the FBI

WASHINGTON (AP) – Former nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee was singled out for an investigation into suspected Chinese espionage because the Energy Department misled the FBI, a government report said.

Two heavily censored chapters of the Justice Department report, declassified Monday, take to task both the DOE and the FBI for the botched probe that lasted years and landed Lee in prison for nine months.

”Had either the FBI or DOE done what it should have done, the FBI could have been investigating in the year 1996 what it is now investigating in the year 2000,” said the report, completed in May 2000 by federal prosecutor Randy Bellows.

The report criticizes the FBI for accepting the DOE assertion that Lee, a former nuclear scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, was ”the only individual … who had opportunity, motivation and legitimate access” to the nuclear weapons information believed to have been leaked to the Chinese.

The DOE targeted Lee because of meetings with Chinese nuclear scientists – both in China and acting as host to the scientists in the United States. Another FBI inquiry into Lee’s conduct at the laboratory was also ongoing at the time.

But the DOE ignored locations other than Los Alamos where the nuclear secrets could have been compromised by numerous other potential suspects.

”The message communicated to the FBI was that the FBI need look no farther within DOE for a suspect. Wen Ho Lee was its man,” the report said. ”The FBI never should have accepted this message, as is.”

The report also faults DOE for giving misleading information to the FBI about its early investigation.

A group of DOE investigators concluded that there was a high probability that U.S. intelligence had helped China ”avoid blind alleys in their own research and development.”

The FBI ”actively pursued corrective action to improve and enhance its counterintelligence program” when it received the Bellows report, the bureau said in a statement.

The Energy Department said, ”this administration continues to strengthen our security procedures,” adding that it will review the report in case other policy changes are necessary.

Lee’s attorneys were traveling and could not be reached.

”The abysmal handling of the initial phases of this case caused serious harm and delay in resolving fundamental questions about a grave compromise of our nuclear secrets,” said Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who has looked into several problems at the FBI, said the report ”shows what can happen when investigators focus too narrowly.”

Lee was held in solitary confinement for nine months and indicted on 59 felony counts alleging he transferred nuclear weapons information to portable computer tapes.

He was not charged with spying, and denied giving information to China. He eventually pleaded guilty to one felony count of downloading sensitive material.

The report was declassified under a judge’s order. Notra Trulock, the DOE’s top security officer during the Lee investigation, says he was defamed by two other investigators who said the Taiwanese-born Lee was targeted because of his race.

While the report says the DOE inappropriately targeted Lee, it concludes it was not because of his race.

Larry Klayman, Trulock’s attorney, said the report’s finding vindicates his client, and the harsh criticism of DOE’s handling of the investigation was not Trulock’s fault.

Trulock said he did not want the investigation to focus on one individual, Klayman said, but that is what superiors instructed him to do.

”To the extent that’s what happened at the highest levels of the Energy Department and the FBI, shame on them,” he said.

Lee has also sued the government for allegedly leaking information to the media that made it appear that he had spied.

On the Net:

Department of Energy:


Los Alamos National Lab:

Wen Ho Lee supporters:

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User