YOUR AD HERE »

Investment Corner: When bigger is not better

Larry Sidney

NVIDIA. Google. Apple. Microsoft. These are names of companies that everyone knows. With valuations in excess of 1 trillion dollars, these “mega-cap” companies are known by investors everywhere. But does being big make a company a better investment?

Publicly traded companies are generally classified by size as either small-cap, mid-cap, or large-cap. “Cap” stands for capitalization, or the value of the company’s outstanding shares. Per Investopedia, small-caps are typically defined as companies valued between $250 million and $2 billion, mid-caps are usually between $2 billion and $10 billion, and large-caps are worth $10 billion or more.

Many investors almost exclusively own large-cap companies. For example, the S&P 500 Index is very often cited as a savvy investment, but it is made up of 81% large-cap companies and 19% mid-cap. Zero small-cap. Large-cap stocks tend to be the most recognizable companies, of course, and so it feels safe to invest in them. However, remember that all of them were small-caps at some point. If you were lucky enough to invest in Apple when it was a small-cap stock, you are likely a multi-millionaire right now!



There’s nothing wrong with large-caps, by the way. They’ve actually given investors the best returns overall during the past decade, and solid returns for a century. But look a bit further into the numbers, and you will see that small-cap outperformed large-cap in approximately 2/3 of rolling 10-year investment periods since 1927, per Dimensional Fund Advisors. That’s nearly 100 years of evidence! And, during that same period, small-cap stocks outperformed large-cap stocks by almost 2% when returns were compounded annually.

Of course, higher expected returns come at a cost. Modern Portfolio Theory tells us that we generally need to take more risk in order to expect higher returns. Small-cap stocks—wouldn’t you know it—on average carry a higher level of risk than do large-caps. So, while we want small-cap stocks in our portfolio, we don’t want them to dominate our portfolio. Rather, we want to hold a big enough chunk of small-caps in our portfolio to improve expected returns without raising our risk level too high.



What is a good investor to do, when large-cap stocks have been hot for a decade-plus, but small-cap stocks have outperformed for 100 years? The same thing you always hear in this column: build a diversified, resilient portfolio with pieces of small, mid and large-cap stocks. From one year to the next, it’s impossible to know which part of the market will outperform the others. Just don’t forget to include small-caps, they can really make your portfolio sing.

However you choose to build your portfolio, invest smartly and invest well!

Larry Sidney is a Zephyr Cove-based Investment Advisor Representative. Information is found at https://palisadeinvestments.com/ or by calling 775-299-4600 x702. This is not a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Clients may hold positions mentioned in this article. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult your financial advisor before purchasing any security.

Share this story

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.