Market Pulse: The winner is … index funds and Vanguard is the leader (Opinion)
I began my career in the 1980s mutual funds that advertised good performance and their insightful portfolio managers.
Some managers (Peter Lynch, for one) became celebrities. At that time “low cost” funds were those without sales charges (called “loads”). Indexing was in its infancy. People thought it was crazy to own only an index rather than have a manager pick attractive stocks or do so themselves.
That was then.
The debate over active versus passive management appears to be over. Thanks to their low fees, index funds have outperformed most of their actively managed peers. According to Morningstar, index funds hit $4.27 trillion in assets, giving them more money than their stock-picking rivals for the first time.
That wouldn’t have happened unless the market was efficient, or nearly so. If analyzing a stock’s bullish fundamental or technical picture automatically would lead to outperformance, then actively managed funds would do better. But if the analysis doesn’t lead to better decisions, then it’s best to keep costs minimal. That’s where Vanguard comes in.
Support Local Journalism
Vanguard is the market leader in index funds. Since the funds simply track an index, they can have extremely low fees. Vanguard’s S&P 500 Exchange-Traded Fund only charges 0.03 percent annually. Other ETF providers like Schwab, SPDR, and iShares have joined the low-fee race.
Of course, just because you own passively managed funds doesn’t make you a passive investor. ETFs provide the flexibility to easily invest in specific areas of the market.
Momentum investors can buy the strongest areas, currently iShares Home Construction (ITB) and believe it or not Utilities Select SPDR (XLU). Investors can profit from the recent shift to value stocks by owning iShares S&P 500 Value (IVE). And the extremely liquid S&P 500 SPDR (SPY) allows traders to easily jump into and out of the market. Of course, that game is easier said than done.
All this doesn’t mean that individual stocks shouldn’t be part of your portfolio. In my managed accounts, I hold both index ETFs and individual stocks. For clients seeking income, I’m happy to own Verizon (VZ) and AT&T (T). I’m also overweighting healthcare by owning stocks like Merck (MRK) and Amgen (AMGN).
By holding a combination of individual stocks (no cost of ownership) along with some low-cost index funds, an investor can build an attractive portfolio that overweights specific sectors while avoiding areas that are less attractive. And all that can be done while paying very little in fees. That is to our advantage.
David Vomund is an Incline Village-based fee-only money manager. Information is found at http://www.VomundInvestments.com or by calling 775-832-8555. Clients hold the positions mentioned in this article. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult your financial advisor before purchasing any security.
Support Local Journalism
Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User