Nevada lawmakers take final action on Internet gambling bill
CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) – On the last day of the 2001 legislative session, Nevada lawmakers voted Monday to make their state the first in the nation to approve gambling in cyberspace.
Legislators made the move even though the Justice Department says Internet gambling is illegal. State officials say court challenges could change the federal government’s position.
Acknowledging there are legal hurdles to clear, casino executives think there is a huge untapped market for Internet gambling.
Experts estimate that revenues from Internet gambling – largely conducted by offshore companies because of the U.S. ban – reached $1.5 billion last year and could reach $6 billion by 2003.
To ensure Nevada’s expansion into Internet gambling moves ahead smoothly, the state Gaming Control Board and state Gaming Commission must first draft and adopt rules governing such gambling.
Those requirements would include assurances that minors wouldn’t be able to play. Also the games couldn’t be conducted from states that prohibit gambling.
Some in New Jersey wanted to beat Nevada into cyberspace. But an Internet gambling bill introduced in the New Jersey legislature in January that would permit casinos in that state to offer blackjack, roulette, slot machines and other games over the Web is stuck in committee and unlikely to see action before the upcoming summer break.
In Nevada, AB466, which moved to Gov. Kenny Guinn for signature on a 17-4 state Senate vote, began as a uniform statewide work card system for casino workers. The Internet gambling provisions were amended into the bill after an initial plan for such gambling died in the Senate.
Proponents said the earlier version, AB578, was a victim of political maneuvering. Casino lobbyists – in another of their numerous legislative successes this session – followed up with more maneuvering to revive the idea.
Opponents included Sen. Terry Care, D-Las Vegas, who said a $500,000, two-year licensing fee for Internet gambling makes it impossible for small casinos and entrepreneurs to participate.
”What this is asking us to do is to legislatively sanction a monopoly for an exclusive few that has always prided itself on the competitive nature of the marketplace,” Care said.
But Senate Judiciary Chairman Mark James, R-Las Vegas, said the $500,000 fee ensures that reputable companies undertake Internet gambling.
”It’s important to get this in now to take advantage of the best gaming regulatory body in the world,” James said. ”And people will know they’re going to be gambling with the best gaming companies.”
Hotel-casinos with unrestricted gambling licenses could apply to conduct Internet gambling, posting the $500,000 fee when applying for two-year licenses.
A manufacturer of an interactive gambling device would pay a $250,000 license fee; a $100,000 fee would be assessed against a manufacturer of equipment associated with a gambling device; and a $50,000 fee would be charged for a license of a manufacturer of peripheral equipment.
Casinos would pay a 6 percent tax on the gross win from the Internet.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California Gov. Gavin Newsom has from the start said his coronavirus policy decisions would be driven by data shared with the public to provide maximum transparency.