Bush speech was like Clinton preaching about chastity | TahoeDailyTribune.com

Bush speech was like Clinton preaching about chastity

Molly Ivins, syndicated columnist

Well, President Bush made his big speech on corporate reform Tuesday, and the stock market went down by 178 points.

As predicted, Bush proposed stiffer penalties for bad apples, evildoers and perpetrators of “malfee-ance.” Unfortunately, that won’t fix the system.

Much as one would like to see many corporate executives doing time alongside hard-working stick-up artists, that leaves the systemic problems in place. Among the leading structural factors causing the cascading scandals are conflict of interest on the part of auditors who also get paid by their clients as consultants, conflict of interest on the part of stock analysts and their investment-banker bosses, abuse of stock options encouraged by not having to count their cost against earnings, and lack of oversight on accountants and insider loans — of the very kind Bush himself got at Harken. Bush addressed none of it.

Stiffer penalties for what is already illegal are not helpful when the problem is what is legal. Bush’s effort to treat this as though it were simply a law ‘n’ order problem is not going to be effective.

Even the law ‘n’ order proposals are pretty pathetic. Bush wants the Securities and Exchange Commission to be able to punish corporate leaders “by banning them from ever serving as officers or directors of a public company.” So if you rip-off your shareholders, destroy your workers’ pensions and bail out just before the crash, taking your golden parachute with you — we’ll never let you do it again! That and 20 lashes with a wet noodle, and now we’re talking deterrence.

The idea of setting up financial crimes SWAT teams would have more appeal if it wasn’t effectively saying, “Don’t worry about a thing — we’re putting John Ashcroft in charge.” Great, there won’t be an uncovered breast to be found anywhere in corporate America. (Just because I can’t resist it, the obvious line about Ashcroft’s 13-month investigation that netted 12 hookers in New Orleans is, “How’d he miss the other 10,000?”) Increasing the SEC’s budget by $100 million sounds like a nice round number, but even the toothless House Republican bill includes almost three times that size — $296 million. Given that the beleaguered agency is understaffed, under-financed, outgunned and outmanned, we could consider spending more than the price of one of our bad helicopters on it.

SEC personnel notoriously make less than those at other government agencies. On top that, they’ve got Harvey Pitt for a chairman. Pitt is the man who came in promising to make the SEC “a kinder and gentler place for accountants.” Although Bush said “self-regulation is not enough,” he did not address the need to create a strong oversight board to audit the auditors.

The rest of Bush’s speech was a stern sermon on corporate ethics. Considering the source, it does raise the always-timely question, “Is God punishing us?” How much cognitive dissonance can one people put up with? If Bush wants to lecture us on physical fitness, that’s fine, but please, not corporate ethics. At least Bill Clinton never preached to us about chastity.

I’m sure we could all use some moral rearmament, but in case you hadn’t noticed, we have no shortage of public scolds in this country. The old Ethics Czar Bill Bennett has been at it for years, not to mention television preachers, radio psychologists, Newt Gingrich, curbstone Freuds, backwoods Jeremiahs, Judge Bork, newspaper ethicists, etiquette consultants and the late Ann Landers. The country does not need another preacher: We need someone who can run the country. And that means someone bright enough to notice systemic problems in the financial markets.

Since the president proposes nothing to fix the problems — the speech was basically a cheap sop to our schadenfreude — we can look for the situation to continue to get worse. We are already seeing a major pullout from U.S. markets by foreign investors.

You may not recall this because the media were totally preoccupied with Monica Lewinsky at the time, but a few years ago about one third of the world’s financial markets collapsed. A few citizens who were paying attention managed some thoughtful analysis of the problems, including the critical role of capital flight by foreign investors. The United States got itself quite an obnoxious reputation at the time for giving condescending and unsound advice, most of it via the World Bank, to the afflicted countries. Time to dig out those old lectures we used to read to others and study them carefully for their errors. It’s our turn in the tank.


Support Local Journalism

Your support means a better informed community. Donate today.