Post Tonopalo, Tahoe Vista projects get cool reception | TahoeDailyTribune.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Post Tonopalo, Tahoe Vista projects get cool reception

Deborah Hakam Carson always thought of Tahoe Vista as a sort of “Hobbit-ville.” When she bought a house there 13 years ago, she liked the old cabins and low-key feel of the place. Now, with high-end developments popping up all over town, it’s not so low profile.

“People who have lived here their whole life can’t afford to live in Tahoe D the development seems to be catered to second homeowners, and it’s pushing out the working class people,” said Carson, a bus driver for the Truckee Tahoe Unified School District. “It’s not quaint, it’s pretentious and based on greed.”

Tonopalo Backlash Ups Awareness About New Projects



Since a grassroots backlash erupted in recent months against the Tonopalo lakeside luxury development, Tahoe Vista residents are leary of projects now in the planning phases. Tonopalo, widely criticized for removing a unique sand dune, has become iconic of the kind of out-of-towner, big money development locals would rather avoid. And since that project seemed to slip through the cracks of county and community scrutiny, officials are encouraging locals to get involved at the beginning of projects by attending public meetings on proposals.

“If people have issues, we need to hear them,” said Placer County Senior Planner Alan Breuch. “The public really needs to be involved in the planning process.”




Steve Kastan, deputy field advisor for Supervisor Rex Bloomfield, said, “I think communities can have a significant impact [on projects] — Tonopalo raised awareness, and now people know what can happen.” Kastan is responsible for publicizing meetings on proposed projects.

Among the projects now in the planning phases are 86 lakeside time shares proposed by the Tahoe Sands resort, 110 units of affordable housing near the Tahoe Vista Regional Park, and 32 additional hotel units proposed by the Mourelatos Lakeshore Resort on the north side of Highway 28.

Placer County Principal Planner Bill Combs said applications have been turned in for the Tahoe Sand time shares and the Mourelatos additions, and now both projects are in the environmental review stage.

“It’s a matter of evaluating the information submitted and seeing the EIR (environmental impact report),” he said, estimating that it will take approximately 45 days, after which the projects will be presented to the public at a North Tahoe Regional Advisory Council meeting. Some projects are addressed at NTRAC meetings twice, once for informational purposes and again for the council to take action.

Getting Involved

Community members are concerned those meetings are not well publicized, though Kastan said he sends notices to an e-mail list serve of 50 people, notifies landowners within 400 feet of the proposed project as required by law and posts meetings in newspapers.

“We have to demand advance notification of every project and when they’ll happen,” said Gary Vandewiele, the Tahoe Vista man responsible for raising questions about the Tonopalo project. “These developers are really smart. They know how to work a local population, and they’re working us big time.”

If anything comes out of his efforts to get the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and the county to disclose why Tonopalo was allowed to “remove” an eolian sand dune, Vandewiele said it should be increased public access to the development process.

Patrick Stone, 14-year Tahoe Vista resident and member of the North Tahoe Business Association, told the World last month that this is the time for community members to get involved.

“The average person doesn’t pay attention until the buildings are going up, and if they don’t start paying attention, it will be approved and done before they have input,” he said.

Placer’s Combs pointed out that Tonopalo went through the standard public input process, and said, “the public is welcome to come to express comments at the NTRAC and Planning Commission meetings, and we encourage them to do so.

Luxury vs. Low Income

The community’s bent on luxury timeshares is a bit different from its take on affordable housing. Many people support adding low-income housing because so many workers are forced to commute from afar or live in poor conditions. However, criticism surrounding the 110 units to be built on 12 acres off National Avenue is based on the concern that developments are being built without the necessary infrastructure to support them.

“Obviously, we need low income and employee housing, but we’re in such a rush to address employee housing, we haven’t addressed other issues like stores, daycare and parking,” said longtime Tahoe Vista resident Stone. “That’s over 500 people in an area with very little infrastructure.”

Bill Span, consultant to the Affordable Housing Development Corporation, said the application for the 110 two-, three- and four-bedroom affordable housing units was submitted to the county on Monday. He said a number of public meeting will be held, and he expects the planning phase will take about a year. No meetings are scheduled yet, but he said they will probably begin in about six weeks.

Karen Van Epps, a Truckee Tahoe Unified School Board member who lives in Tahoe Vista, said there are needs that must be addressed if additional housing is built, including childcare, traffic control, post office boxes and transportation.

In light of the massive Martis Valley Plan, Van Epps said whether luxury or low-income, North Shore developments should be discussed together as one integrated development plan, as the impact of more cars and people cannot be limited to one area.

Officials say these concerns will be addressed at the public meetings held as the planning phase progresses. Preliminary meetings have been held to address the Tahoe Sands 86-unit proposal, but it has not yet been presented to NTRAC, said Kastan.

Carson, the school bus driver, said she has gone to a few meetings in the past and will continue to attend. “I think there’s people that will go,” she said. Supportive of proposed affordable housing but critical of high-end resorts, she added, “We need the low-income housingE but I don’t want to see us destroy this place by pushing out ordinary folks who want to live here by creating an environment for only those in the upper echelons.”


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User