Judge issues restraining order to temporarily stop Measure T occupancy limits in South Lake Tahoe | TahoeDailyTribune.com

Judge issues restraining order to temporarily stop Measure T occupancy limits in South Lake Tahoe

South Lake Tahoe City Council is moving forward with a cap on VHR permits in residential areas outside of the tourist core.
Tribune File Photo

PLACERVILLE, Calif. — An El Dorado County judge has issued a restraining order that temporarily prohibits the city of South Lake Tahoe from enforcing occupancy limits in vacation home rentals brought on by the recently voter-passed Measure T.

About a dozen people were in attendance Monday in El Dorado County Superior Court to hear Judge Thomas A. Smith’s decision.

The matter was originally slated to be heard last Wednesday in South Lake Tahoe after a lawsuit was filed the day before, but Superior Court Judge Michael McLaughlin recused himself for reasons that have not been clarified.

Andrew Pierce, representing the South Lake Tahoe Property Owners Group who filed the suit, told Judge Smith that Measure T was unconstitutional and it should be overturned. But first the group just wanted to place a temporary restraining order due to the “thousands” that have already made vacation plans.

South Shore resident Scott Robbins, a Measure T supporter, said the judge’s decision didn’t mean a whole lot. He said the city already made the decision to use discretion on enforcing the new occupancy limits.

“Since the city decided to postpone implementing Measure T, this ruling doesn’t change much right now,” Robbins said.

City attorney Heather Stroud said she and City Manager Frank Rush needed to go before City Council to get more direction before moving forward.

The court appearance lasted about 15 minutes, but after the ruling, Rush and Stroud were questioned by T supporters.

Robbins questioned whether the city would vigorously defend the measure.

“The city has a fairly extensive history of prioritizing tax revenue over quality of life for its residents,” Robbins said. “But we fully expect it to be adjudicated in our favor and the vote upheld.”

Rush, who has been on the job for several weeks, said the city will enforce the measure.

“The timing is the biggest challenge for us,” Rush said. “But we’re committed to enforcing it and implementing it in a proper manner.”

The city has already stated it would use discretion on how it will enforce the new rules, especially since many visitors have made plans.

Measure T was a citizen-driven initiative that asked voters if they wanted to ban VHRs in residential areas. The only exception is that full-time residents have the ability to rent out their home up to 30 days per year.

It passed by 58 votes.

The ban does not take effect for three years, but the new occupancy limits were to be implemented immediately.

The temporary restraining order is in place until Jan. 24, when the court will hear further arguments at 8:30 a.m. in department 9, located at 3321 Cameron Park Drive, Cameron Park, California.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around the Lake Tahoe Basin and beyond make the Tahoe Tribune's work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Your donation will help us continue to cover COVID-19 and our other vital local news.